No. AI Isn't '99%' More 'Creative' Than Humans.
Actually, I think when it is use for minor things like "touch-ups", textures and backgrounds, it's great. I recently used it on some animations I was working on. It adds a bit more "realistic" details with the proper LORAS and model.
Basically, I think of AI as a tool to help you be creative or to ADD to your vision. Humans will always be more creative than machines because it was our creative that created those machines to begin with.
I find it very strange that articles are being spammed. Titled: "AI is 99% more creative than Humans!"
Propaganda, nonsense. Mostly to fuel capitalism and greed.
These "studies" always come out when there is a big push to capitalize on profits, and convince everyone not a part of the "It" crowd, it's good for them! Obviously, losing your job, having your identity stole/art/life/voice etc stolen and replicated for eternity is great for corporations.
They are done to brainwash you. I like this Reddit thread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1cs23uq/artificial_intelligence_is_already_more_creative/
When they say "99%", the studies must have been done on the people they hire at their companies.
Also, many "AI companies" have censored their AI programs. You know? When you get to "creative" with your prompts. The absurdity.
You are typing in what you want created, they say that AI is more creative.
You are forming the idea, AI is helping you paint the picture.
Get it? "99%". Cut it out.
Yes. "99%". That's the number they use when they know they are spewing nonsense. Just like "ONLY $0.99 cents! AI is better at taking CREATED things, and blending them together into a pot or finding patterns and replicating it.
Opinion: AI art by itself, with no actual artistic input is basically the least creative thing you can do, no matter how good your "prompts" are. I can make an AI masterpiece by typing one word. AI is not more creative than humans, it's just easier and produces generic, blended images faster.
